BUSH: THE PRESIDENT OF MAKE-BELIEVE

In Bush's televised speech, Bush begged us to put aside our differences and work towards a common goal. (Plausible, if only he didn't decide to become the Decider, and decide that the people's voice and opinion didn't fit with his own little schemes of world domination--er...world liberation.)

His second pitch was (once again) trying to connect Iraq to the world on terror--even though he acknowledged (a shocker--yes, I know!) that Saddam had nothing to do with 9-11, and didn't have any connections to Al-Qaeda--and that we must 'stay the course'. (Cliche, cliche, sooo cliche!)

But here's the kicker: He says that even though Saddam didn't have any WMDs (his main justification for going to war), the man still posed a grave threat to the world and needed to be removed!

Which brings me to these questions:

How can a disposed dictator without any WMDs--or an army which was blown back into the Stone Age--possibly pose a grave threat to the world? What makes Saddam still a threat to anyone?

Schuyler Thorpe

xxxth Streetxx #X001

Everett, WA 98204

(XXX)-XXX-XXXX

starchildalpha1@yahoo.com